doc: merge repmgrd split network handling description into failover section

doc/filelist.sgml

@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
 <!ENTITY repmgrd-automatic-failover SYSTEM "repmgrd-automatic-failover.sgml">
 <!ENTITY repmgrd-configuration SYSTEM "repmgrd-configuration.sgml">
 <!ENTITY repmgrd-operation SYSTEM "repmgrd-operation.sgml">
-<!ENTITY repmgrd-network-split SYSTEM "repmgrd-network-split.sgml">
 <!ENTITY repmgrd-witness-server SYSTEM "repmgrd-witness-server.sgml">
 <!ENTITY repmgrd-bdr SYSTEM "repmgrd-bdr.sgml">
 

doc/repmgr.sgml

@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@
   &repmgrd-automatic-failover;
   &repmgrd-configuration;
   &repmgrd-operation;
-  &repmgrd-network-split;
   &repmgrd-witness-server;
   &repmgrd-bdr;
  </part>

doc/repmgrd-automatic-failover.sgml

@@ -43,5 +43,57 @@
  </para>
 
   </sect1>
+<sect1 id="repmgrd-network-split" xreflabel="Handling network splits with repmgrd">
+ <indexterm>
+   <primary>repmgrd</primary>
+   <secondary>network splits</secondary>
+ </indexterm>
+
+ <indexterm>
+   <primary>network splits</primary>
+ </indexterm>
+
+ <title>Handling network splits with repmgrd</title>
+ <para>
+  A common pattern for replication cluster setups is to spread servers over
+  more than one datacentre. This can provide benefits such as geographically-
+  distributed read replicas and DR (disaster recovery capability). However
+  this also means there is a risk of disconnection at network level between
+  datacentre locations, which would result in a split-brain scenario if
+  servers in a secondary data centre were no longer able to see the primary
+  in the main data centre and promoted a standby among themselves.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+  &repmgr; enables provision of &quot;<xref linkend="witness-server">&quot; to
+  artificially create a quorum of servers in a particular location, ensuring
+  that nodes in another location will not elect a new primary if they
+  are unable to see the majority of nodes. However this approach does not
+  scale well, particularly with more complex replication setups, e.g.
+  where the majority of nodes are located outside of the primary datacentre.
+  It also means the <literal>witness</literal> node needs to be managed as an
+  extra PostgreSQL instance outside of the main replication cluster, which
+  adds administrative and programming complexity.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+  <literal>repmgr4</literal> introduces the concept of <literal>location</literal>:
+  each node is associated with an arbitrary location string (default is
+  <literal>default</literal>); this is set in <filename>repmgr.conf</filename>, e.g.:
+  <programlisting>
+    node_id=1
+    node_name=node1
+    conninfo='host=node1 user=repmgr dbname=repmgr connect_timeout=2'
+    data_directory='/var/lib/postgresql/data'
+    location='dc1'</programlisting>
+ </para>
+ <para>
+  In a failover situation, <application>repmgrd</application> will check if any servers in the
+  same location as the current primary node are visible.  If not, <application>repmgrd</application>
+  will assume a network interruption and not promote any node in any
+  other location (it will however enter <link linkend="repmgrd-degraded-monitoring">degraded monitoring</link>
+  mode until a primary becomes visible).
+ </para>
+
+</sect1>
+
 
 </chapter>

doc/repmgrd-network-split.sgml

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-<chapter id="repmgrd-network-split" xreflabel="Handling network splits with repmgrd">
- <indexterm>
-   <primary>repmgrd</primary>
-   <secondary>network splits</secondary>
- </indexterm>
-
- <title>Handling network splits with repmgrd</title>
- <para>
-  A common pattern for replication cluster setups is to spread servers over
-  more than one datacentre. This can provide benefits such as geographically-
-  distributed read replicas and DR (disaster recovery capability). However
-  this also means there is a risk of disconnection at network level between
-  datacentre locations, which would result in a split-brain scenario if
-  servers in a secondary data centre were no longer able to see the primary
-  in the main data centre and promoted a standby among themselves.
- </para>
- <para>
-  &repmgr; enables provision of &quot;<xref linkend="witness-server">&quot; to
-  artificially create a quorum of servers in a particular location, ensuring
-  that nodes in another location will not elect a new primary if they
-  are unable to see the majority of nodes. However this approach does not
-  scale well, particularly with more complex replication setups, e.g.
-  where the majority of nodes are located outside of the primary datacentre.
-  It also means the <literal>witness</literal> node needs to be managed as an
-  extra PostgreSQL instance outside of the main replication cluster, which
-  adds administrative and programming complexity.
- </para>
- <para>
-  <literal>repmgr4</literal> introduces the concept of <literal>location</literal>:
-  each node is associated with an arbitrary location string (default is
-  <literal>default</literal>); this is set in <filename>repmgr.conf</filename>, e.g.:
-  <programlisting>
-    node_id=1
-    node_name=node1
-    conninfo='host=node1 user=repmgr dbname=repmgr connect_timeout=2'
-    data_directory='/var/lib/postgresql/data'
-    location='dc1'</programlisting>
- </para>
- <para>
-  In a failover situation, <application>repmgrd</application> will check if any servers in the
-  same location as the current primary node are visible.  If not, <application>repmgrd</application>
-  will assume a network interruption and not promote any node in any
-  other location (it will however enter <link linkend="repmgrd-degraded-monitoring">degraded monitoring</link>
-  mode until a primary becomes visible).
- </para>
-
-</chapter>
-