From 92a62a958e05031d8f69074a35e1250fa9695cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Barwick <ian@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:36:58 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] doc: clarify statement about BDR HA support

---
 doc/repmgrd-bdr.sgml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/repmgrd-bdr.sgml b/doc/repmgrd-bdr.sgml
index 9af47b6a..6f757882 100644
--- a/doc/repmgrd-bdr.sgml
+++ b/doc/repmgrd-bdr.sgml
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
   </para>
   <note>
     <simpara>
-      Due to the nature of BDR, it's only safe to use this solution for
+      Due to the nature of BDR 1.x/2.x, it's only safe to use this solution for
       a two-node scenario. Introducing additional nodes will create an inherent
       risk of node desynchronisation if a node goes down without being cleanly
       removed from the cluster.