If failover=automatic, it would be reasonable to expect repmgrd to
consider this node as a promotion candidate, however this will not
happen if it is marked inactive. This often happens when a failed
primary is recloned as a standby but not re-registered, and if
repmgrd would run it would give the incorrect impression that
failover capability is available.
Addresses GitHub #153.
This makes keeping track of events such as failovers
much easier. Note that this is for convenience and is
not a foolproof auditing log.
Sample output:
repmgr_db=# SELECT * from repmgr_test.repl_events ;
node_id | event | successful | event_timestamp | details
---------+--------------------------+------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------
1 | master_register | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:08.196636+09 |
2 | standby_clone | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:17.660768+09 | Backup method: pg_basebackup; --force: N
2 | standby_register | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:18.762222+09 |
4 | witness_create | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:22.072815+09 |
3 | standby_clone | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:23.524673+09 | Backup method: pg_basebackup; --force: N
3 | standby_register | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:24.620161+09 |
2 | repmgrd_start | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:29.639096+09 |
3 | repmgrd_start | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:29.641489+09 |
4 | repmgrd_start | t | 2015-03-06 14:14:29.648002+09 |
2 | standby_promote | t | 2015-03-06 14:15:01.956737+09 | Node 2 was successfully be promoted to master
2 | repmgrd_failover_promote | t | 2015-03-06 14:15:01.964771+09 | Node 2 promoted to master; old master 1 marked as failed
3 | repmgrd_failover_follow | t | 2015-03-06 14:15:07.228493+09 | Node 3 now following new upstream node 2
(12 rows)
