Commit 0574279 set the file permissions to 0600 rather than the user's
umask, but if initdb was executed with -g/--allow-group-access, the
file is maintained with 0640, so we'll just maintain the existing
permssions.
From PostgreSQL 12, the SQL-level function "pg_promote()" can be used
to promote a PostgreSQL instance, however usage is restricted to
superusers and users to whom explicit execution permission for this
function has been granted.
Therefore, if execution permission is not available, fall back to
"pg_ctl promote".
In a few places, replication connections are generated from the
parameters used by existing connections. This has resulted in a
number of similar blocks of code which do more-or-less the same
thing almost but not quite identically. In two cases, the code
omitted to set "dbname=replication", which can cause problems
in some contexts.
These code blocks have now been consolidated into standardized
functions.
This also resolves the issue addressed by GitHub #619.
Make the code previously only used by "standby follow" generally
available - we'll want to use this from "node rejoin" as well.
While we're at it, when reporting failure due to lack of free
replication slots, report the current value of "max_replication_slots".
Enable operations which create or drop replication slots to be carried
out with the minimum necessary user permissions, i.e. a user with the
REPLICATION attribute.
This can be the repmgr user, or a dedicated replication user.
In the latter case, if the dedicated replication user is only
permitted to make replication connections, the streaming
replication protocol is used to create/drop slots.
Implements part of GitHub #536.
Append "_sql" to the respective function names, as we'll later be
creating equivalent functions which use the replication protocol
so need a way to distinguish between them.
repmgr has always insisted on determining the upstream's data directory
location, which requires superuser permissions (or from PostgreSQL 10,
membership of the default role "pg_read_all_settings").
Knowledge of the data directory location was required to implement rsync
cloning (now deprecated), but with pg_basebackup the minimum permission
requirement is now only a normal user with access to the repmgr metadata
and a user with replication permissions. The ability to determine the
data directory location is only required if the user specifies the
--copy-external-config-files option, which needs to be able to determine
the data directory to work out which configuration files are located
outside it.
This patch makes it possible to clone a standby with minimum
permissions, with appropriate checks for available permissions if
--copy-external-config-files is provided.
Implements part of GitHub #536 and addresses issue raised in #586.
From PostgreSQL 10, a member of the default roles "pg_monitor" and/or
"pg_read_all_settings" can read pg_settings without requiring superuser
privileges.
Previously, a hint was being emitted about making the repmgr user a
member of one of those groups, but no check for membership was being
made, meaning the check could only be run by a superuser.
This helps provide a better picture of the state of the cluster, i.e.
making it more obvious whether there's been a timeline divergence.
This also provides infrastructure for further improvements in cluster
status display and diagnosis.
Note this is only available in PostgreSQL 9.6 and later as it relies
on the SQL functions for interrogating pg_control, which can be executed
remotely. As PostgreSQL 9.5 will shortly be the only community-supported
version without these functions, it's not worth the effort of trying
to duplicate their functionality.
Previously repmgr would happily clone from whatever server
it found at the provided source server address. We should
ensure that a standby can only be cloned from a node which
is part of the main replication cluster.
This check fetches a list of nodes from the source server,
connects to the first non-witness server it finds, and
compares the system identifiers of the source node and the
node it has connected to. If there is a mismatch, then the
source server is clearly not part of the main replication
cluster, and is most likely the witness server.
This enables us to better determine whether a node is definitively
attached, definitively not attached, or if it was not possible to
determine the attached state.
This functionality enables repmgrd (when running on the primary) to
monitor connected child nodes. It will log connections and disconnections
and generate events.
Additionally, repmgrd can execute a custom script if the number of connected
child nodes falls below a configurable threshold. This script can be used
e.g. to "fence" the primary following a failover situation where a new primary
has been promoted and all standbys are now child nodes of that primary.
In "recovery.conf", the configuration parameter "node_name" is used
as the "application_name" value, which will be truncated by PostgreSQL
to 63 characters (NAMEDATALEN - 1).
repmgr sometimes needs to be able to extract the application name from
pg_stat_replication to determine if a node is connected (e.g. when
executing "repmgr standby register"), so the comparison will fail
if "node_name" exceeds 63 characters.
Previously, repmgrd assumed that during a failover, there would not
already be another primary node. However it's possible a node was
promoted manually. While this is not a desirable situation, it's
conceivable this could happen in the wild, so we should check for
it and react accordingly.
Also sanity-check that the follow target can actually be followed.
Addresses issue raised in GitHub #420.
Log the output of PQerrorStatus() in a couple of places where it was missing.
Additionally, always log the output of PQerrorStatus() starting with a blank
line, otherwise the first line looks like it was emitted by repmgr, and
it's harder to scan the error message.
Before:
[2019-03-20 11:24:15] [DETAIL] could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (::1) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5501?
could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (127.0.0.1) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5501?
After:
[2019-03-20 11:27:21] [DETAIL]
could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (::1) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5501?
could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (127.0.0.1) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5501?
