doc: merge repmgrd split network handling description into failover section

This commit is contained in:
Ian Barwick
2019-03-13 15:55:53 +09:00
parent 960acfeb3c
commit 69cb3f1e82
4 changed files with 52 additions and 50 deletions

View File

@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
<!ENTITY repmgrd-automatic-failover SYSTEM "repmgrd-automatic-failover.sgml">
<!ENTITY repmgrd-configuration SYSTEM "repmgrd-configuration.sgml">
<!ENTITY repmgrd-operation SYSTEM "repmgrd-operation.sgml">
<!ENTITY repmgrd-network-split SYSTEM "repmgrd-network-split.sgml">
<!ENTITY repmgrd-witness-server SYSTEM "repmgrd-witness-server.sgml">
<!ENTITY repmgrd-bdr SYSTEM "repmgrd-bdr.sgml">

View File

@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@
&repmgrd-automatic-failover;
&repmgrd-configuration;
&repmgrd-operation;
&repmgrd-network-split;
&repmgrd-witness-server;
&repmgrd-bdr;
</part>

View File

@@ -43,5 +43,57 @@
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="repmgrd-network-split" xreflabel="Handling network splits with repmgrd">
<indexterm>
<primary>repmgrd</primary>
<secondary>network splits</secondary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>network splits</primary>
</indexterm>
<title>Handling network splits with repmgrd</title>
<para>
A common pattern for replication cluster setups is to spread servers over
more than one datacentre. This can provide benefits such as geographically-
distributed read replicas and DR (disaster recovery capability). However
this also means there is a risk of disconnection at network level between
datacentre locations, which would result in a split-brain scenario if
servers in a secondary data centre were no longer able to see the primary
in the main data centre and promoted a standby among themselves.
</para>
<para>
&repmgr; enables provision of &quot;<xref linkend="witness-server">&quot; to
artificially create a quorum of servers in a particular location, ensuring
that nodes in another location will not elect a new primary if they
are unable to see the majority of nodes. However this approach does not
scale well, particularly with more complex replication setups, e.g.
where the majority of nodes are located outside of the primary datacentre.
It also means the <literal>witness</literal> node needs to be managed as an
extra PostgreSQL instance outside of the main replication cluster, which
adds administrative and programming complexity.
</para>
<para>
<literal>repmgr4</literal> introduces the concept of <literal>location</literal>:
each node is associated with an arbitrary location string (default is
<literal>default</literal>); this is set in <filename>repmgr.conf</filename>, e.g.:
<programlisting>
node_id=1
node_name=node1
conninfo='host=node1 user=repmgr dbname=repmgr connect_timeout=2'
data_directory='/var/lib/postgresql/data'
location='dc1'</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
In a failover situation, <application>repmgrd</application> will check if any servers in the
same location as the current primary node are visible. If not, <application>repmgrd</application>
will assume a network interruption and not promote any node in any
other location (it will however enter <link linkend="repmgrd-degraded-monitoring">degraded monitoring</link>
mode until a primary becomes visible).
</para>
</sect1>
</chapter>

View File

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
<chapter id="repmgrd-network-split" xreflabel="Handling network splits with repmgrd">
<indexterm>
<primary>repmgrd</primary>
<secondary>network splits</secondary>
</indexterm>
<title>Handling network splits with repmgrd</title>
<para>
A common pattern for replication cluster setups is to spread servers over
more than one datacentre. This can provide benefits such as geographically-
distributed read replicas and DR (disaster recovery capability). However
this also means there is a risk of disconnection at network level between
datacentre locations, which would result in a split-brain scenario if
servers in a secondary data centre were no longer able to see the primary
in the main data centre and promoted a standby among themselves.
</para>
<para>
&repmgr; enables provision of &quot;<xref linkend="witness-server">&quot; to
artificially create a quorum of servers in a particular location, ensuring
that nodes in another location will not elect a new primary if they
are unable to see the majority of nodes. However this approach does not
scale well, particularly with more complex replication setups, e.g.
where the majority of nodes are located outside of the primary datacentre.
It also means the <literal>witness</literal> node needs to be managed as an
extra PostgreSQL instance outside of the main replication cluster, which
adds administrative and programming complexity.
</para>
<para>
<literal>repmgr4</literal> introduces the concept of <literal>location</literal>:
each node is associated with an arbitrary location string (default is
<literal>default</literal>); this is set in <filename>repmgr.conf</filename>, e.g.:
<programlisting>
node_id=1
node_name=node1
conninfo='host=node1 user=repmgr dbname=repmgr connect_timeout=2'
data_directory='/var/lib/postgresql/data'
location='dc1'</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
In a failover situation, <application>repmgrd</application> will check if any servers in the
same location as the current primary node are visible. If not, <application>repmgrd</application>
will assume a network interruption and not promote any node in any
other location (it will however enter <link linkend="repmgrd-degraded-monitoring">degraded monitoring</link>
mode until a primary becomes visible).
</para>
</chapter>